Assistant
Superintendent for
Human Resources
Richard Werlin's
manner toward
employees was
so aggressive and
hostile that one
principal fell to the
floor with a stroke

while being verbally
assaulted by Richard
Werlin.

Werlin was handpicked
by Libia Gil, who was
brought down from
Seattle by Patrick Judd
because she was well
known for her hostility
to teachers.
OCTOBER 5, 2001

MAURA LARKINS WAS TOLD TO
REPORT BACK TO WORK; SHE SAID
SHE DID NOT FEEL SAFE UNTIL THERE
HAD BEEN AN INVESTIGATION
REGARDING A POSSIBLE SHOOTING.

Mrs. Larkins attended every meeting the Superintendent
asked her to attend.  One teacher testified many people
feared Mrs. Larkins would come and shoot them all.  Neither
the Superintendent nor Richard Werlin ever investigated
these allegations.  Were Superintendent Libia Gil and
Richard Werlin dangerously incompetent?  It would seem to
be the case.
THE "TENTATIVE" REPORT CONTAINED NOTHING MORE
THAN GENERAL ALLEGATIONS, WITHOUT ANY  SPECIFIC
DATES, WORDS OR ACTIONS ON WHICH THE
ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HER MIGHT HAVE BEEN BASED.
Daniel Shinoff, a lawyer
who relies on
dishonesty and
intimidation to obtain
legal victories on behalf
of school districts, was
representing the District
when the district
violated EERA on
November 14, 2002.

Why do we taxpayers
have lawyers like this
working for us?

Answer:
Because the SDCOE
JPA's Diane Crosier
likes them, and the top
brass at SDCOE likes
Diane Crosier.
Maura Larkins feared, as
any rational person
would, that if she went
back again, the same
thing (or worse) would
happen as happened the
first two times she went
back.
The district violated
California law by
serving dismissal
charges on Maura
Larkins  in retaliation
for filing three
grievances.

CTA looked the other
way.  Why?  Because it
was helping to cover
up crimes committed
by Gina Boyd, Jim
Groth and Tim O'Neill
and district personnel.
The District never
investigated the
allegations against Mrs.
Larkins, nor Mrs. Larkins'
allegations of Werlin's
dishonest and aggressive
behavior.

District law firms,
including
Parham & Rajcic
as well as
Stutz, Artiano,
Shinoff & Holtz, help
districts  keep facts and
documents hidden.  They
also  file in court
documents they know to
be false.
Click here for false document prepared by
Richard Werlin
after Maura Larkins filed her
lawsuit.
Click here for original November 21, 2001 report.
One teacher testified that
many people claimed to
fear that Mrs. Larkins
would come and shoot
everyone.   

The school board never
bothered to investigate
these alarming charges,
but it did encourage a
hysterical frenzy, not
unlike the Salem Witch
Trials.
It was open season on
this employee at CVESD.  
Anyone could make any
allegation, no matter how
preposterous, and Richard
Werlin would act on it.
WERLIN'S FIRST (AND FINAL!) REPORT
WAS LABELED "TENTATIVE"
Why was there no final report?

Richard Werlin gave a report to Maura Larkins on November
21, 2001, but he later prepared a different  document which
district lawyer Mark Bresee submitted as evidence in Maura
Larkins' dismissal hearing--even though a true copy of
Werlin's November 21, 2001 report had already been filed
with PERB!
CVESD
Illegal Retaliation for Filing
Grievances
On November 14, 2001, ONE day after
she filed three grievances,  CVESD
threatened to dismiss Larkins, and
drew up bogus charges against her.  

But the school board did not immediately take action on  
Human Resource director Richard Werlin's charges until the
following year, on May 7, 2002, just weeks after Larkins
filed a lawsuit.  

The school board decision to dismiss Larkins clearly stated
that she was being fired for filing grievances and a lawsuit.

 
The school board thus violated Labor Code section 1102.5,
which makes it illegal to fire an employee for reporting
wrongdoing.
O.  NOVEMBER 14, 2001
ONE DAY AFTER DISTRICT RECEIVED
GRIEVANCES,
MAURA LARKINS WAS
DISMISSAL.

But the threat was NOT carried out the
following May,
six weeks after Larkins
filed a lawsuit.  Firing someone for
filing grievances or a lawsuit is a
violation of Labor Code section 1102.5.
Yet that is precisely what the final
decision to dismiss Larkins said: that
she was being fired for filing
grievances and a lawsuit.
3. Stop pay grievance  

More illegal actions were committed by Richard Werlin as
he struggled to make others pay for his crimes. Why didn't
he just do the right thing?  It boggles the mind.  He
accomplished nothing good for anyone, least of all himself.  
Sometimes people are mean even when it isn't in their own
best interest.  None of the malicious actions in this case
resulted in any good outcome for anyone.  When will
CVESD and Castle Park Elementary get honest leaders who
refuse to tolerate dishonest teachers?

This grievance concerned a violation of contract FAR MORE
SERIOUS than the contract violation regarding the transfer
of Robin Donlan, Peggie Myers, Stephenie Parker-Pettit,
and Nikki Perez, of which the SDUT, La Prensa and the
Star-News complained so vociferously three years later.  

The shocking turn-around of CVE officials Tim O'Neill, Gina
Boyd and Jim Groth is mind-boggling.  In an effort to cover
up their own crimes, they went along with a clearly-illegal
transfer in 2001 in which the superintendent did not meet
with the transferred teacher.  

Then, in a complete about-face, three years later, when
Robin Donlan and others were transferred, O'Neill, Groth
and Boyd claimed that a meeting with the superintendent
WAS NOT ENOUGH!

Exhibit p. 1  
Exhibit p. 2
1. Safety grievance

The teachers union and the district shared a complete
disregard for
safety.  Serious accusations  of a possible
shooting were never investigated.

It is sad but true that CVESD board incumbents (Cheryl
Cox, Patrick Judd, Bertha Lopez, Larry Cunningham and
Pamela Smith) were ALL RE-ELECTED IN 2004 AND 2006
AFTER they refused to investigate the report by two
teachers that another teacher was going to come to school
and shoot everybody.

How did the board get away with such incompetence? It
was kept secret by the San Diego Union-Tribune and La
Prensa and the Chula Vista Star-News.  

The
SDUT and La Prensa  and the Star-News knew about
the serious  incompetence and illegal actions of the board,
but  kept it secret.  The SDUT and the Star-News wanted to
protect the right-wing board, while La Prensa wanted to
protect the teachers union, which had been fully involved in
the wrongdoing.

The SDUT created the false impression of fairness by
printing opposition viewpoints--that really weren't
opposition viewpoints at all.  The opponents of the school
board who were given space in the SDUT to express their
viewpoints never made a peep about the board's criminal
actions and use of taxpayer dollars to defend those criminal
actions.  For example, Felicia Starr, whom the SDUT
endorsed, was a close friend of teachers union president
Gina Boyd, who worked with the district, supporting every
crime that was committed.

The SDUT kept the big secrets of the incumbents, while at
the same time allowing Don Sevrens to write meaningless
diatribes against the board for transferring Robin Donlan
and other teachers in 2004.
SAN DIEGO
EDUCATION REPORT
mauralarkins.com
Maura Larkins' OAH Hearing
CVESD board:

2000-2006
Cheryl Cox
Pamela Smith
Patrick Judd
Larry Cunningham
Bertha Lopez

In 2006,
David Bejarano
replaced Cheryl Cox.
Page 12
SD Education Rprt Blog
NOVEMBER 13, 2001
MAURA LARKINS FILED
3 GRIEVANCES:
Chula Vista Elementary School District
SITE MAP
Retaliation started one day after
employee filed grievances
CVESD NEVER INVESTIGATED
THE COMPLAINTS OF TWO
EMPLOYEES
The CVESD board was desperate to cover up illegal actions
by the district and employees
P.  NOVEMBER 21, 2001

MR. WERLIN GAVE MAURA LARKINS
THE ONE AND ONLY REPORT HE
EVER PREPARED ABOUT HER
SITUATION--THEN CREATED AND
SUBMITTED AN ALTERED
DOCUMENT
Cheryl Cox
demonstrates
similar
behavior as Mayor of
Chula Vista: silencing
an employee through
harassment
These officials agree with
Cox, Judd, Cunningham,
Smith and Lopez that
petitioning for redress of
grievances should be
punished severely.
Richard Werlin got a job in WCCUSD after he left CVESD