2008 GCCCD board candidate |
2006 [Below is the prescient essay I wrote about Rosinski in 2006.] Questions for Ms. Rosinski: Did Barbara Abeyta come to you, the President of her CTA local, and ask for advice as to whether an effort should be made to correct her illegal OAH decision, Ms. Rosinski? Did you support, as Abeyta did, firing a teacher for filing grievances and a lawsuit? That was the order coming down from CTA headquarters in Burlingame, and no one messes with Beverly Tucker and Caroline Doggett, right? Certainly not if they want support from the Democratic Party in an election. Did you give Barbara Abeyta any support in such an effort? I ask this as a Democrat who is disgusted with craven obedience of the Democratic Party to the teachers union. [The answer to this question is a resounding YES. I discovered in 2008 that Rosinski was on the board that directed Tim O'Neill, the executive director of South County Teachers United, to cover up illegal actions, and authorized CTA lawyers to help him. Rosinski was also president of the teachers union in National School District, where Barbara Abeyta worked.] 2006 candidate for Grossmont High School District Board,* former President National City Elementary Teachers Association. *Update 2006: Ms. Rosinski is running for Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District instead. Was someone afraid Rosinski would be an embarrassment to the teachers at GUHSD? The truth is, Rosinski is very likely among the least dishonest of CTA officials. |
To East County PAC, 2006 San Diego Have you questioned your candidate, Mary Kay Rosinski, about financial support of illegal activitiesby CTA when she was president of National City Elementary Teachers Association? Why not help your candidate by supporting efforts to rectify illegal actions by CTA against teachers? Or have you advised her to stay in line with CTA, to keep the campaign money flowing? |
Mary Kay Rosinski |
mauralarkins.com |
I think I made a mistake when I wrote this: |
While reading this San Diego Union Tribune article about Mary Kay Rosinski's big-money backers, I was wishing that the reporter had asked Mary Kay Rosinski why she didn't run against incumbent Bill Garrett. I have concluded that it was because Rosinski didn't want to criticize Garrett's corrupt decisions. She's not anti-corruption, she's just pro-union. She targeted the one board member who had questioned corrupt actions, trustee Timothy Caruthers, who complained to the FBI after learning that district Chancellor Omero Suarez had the buyout clause deleted from his contract. Suarez re-inserted the buyout clause when Caruthers made inquiries about it. Rosinski has a record of paying union lawyers to cover up wrongdoing in Chula Vista Elementary School District. GCCCD can count on Rosinski to work well with GCCCD's current lawyers; her union lawyers worked with Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz in at least one case in South County Teachers United when Rosinski was a board member. (Her work for SCTU was detailed in Rosinski's campaign materials.) I got fooled by Rosinski when she said she had questions about GCCCD's legal expenditures. I imagine the only question she'll ask Stutz law firm is, "How much money do you need to keep this quiet?" |
2008 election: I think I made a mistake voting for Mary Kay Rosinski. |