S. FEBRUARY 2002
MAURA LARKINS FILED A PERB CHARGE AGAINST THE
DISTRICT.
T. MARCH 2002
MAURA LARKINS FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DISTRICT.
U. MAY 7, 2002
THE SCHOOL BOARD VOTED TO DISMISS PETITIONER—
SEVEN MONTHS AFTER SHE REFUSED TO REPORT TO
WORK; IT HAD NO REASON TO DISMISS HER SINCE SHE
WASN’T WORKING AND WASN’T BEING PAID; ITS MOTIVE
WAS CLEARLY RETALIATION FOR FILING THE LAWSUIT.
The District was happy to keep everything quiet, as long as
Mrs. Larkins stayed home and wasn’t paid. But when Mrs.
Larkins filed suit, the District figured that a good offense was
the best defense.
MAURA LARKINS FILED A PERB CHARGE AGAINST THE
DISTRICT.
T. MARCH 2002
MAURA LARKINS FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DISTRICT.
U. MAY 7, 2002
THE SCHOOL BOARD VOTED TO DISMISS PETITIONER—
SEVEN MONTHS AFTER SHE REFUSED TO REPORT TO
WORK; IT HAD NO REASON TO DISMISS HER SINCE SHE
WASN’T WORKING AND WASN’T BEING PAID; ITS MOTIVE
WAS CLEARLY RETALIATION FOR FILING THE LAWSUIT.
The District was happy to keep everything quiet, as long as
Mrs. Larkins stayed home and wasn’t paid. But when Mrs.
Larkins filed suit, the District figured that a good offense was
the best defense.
| It is a violation of Labor Code section 1102.5 to dismiss an employee for filing a lawsuit or a PERB charge. |
| Do San Diego and Chula Vista public officials choose lawyers who will benefit them personally at the expense of the taxpayers and voters? |
| Page 14 |
| The California Office of Administrative Hearings Itself Violated Labor Code section 1102.5 |
| The Judge Boldly Stated that Maura Larkins Was Dismissed for Reporting Wrongdoing! |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| SAN DIEGO EDUCATION REPORT |
| mauralarkins.com |
| Illegal OAH Decision |