J. SEPTEMBER 2001
WERLIN BEGAN FAXING MAURA LARKINS WHEN HER
LAWYER WAS OUT OF TOWN, DEMANDING THAT MRS.
LARKINS COME IN WITHOUT HER LAWYER AND MEET
WITH HIM; MAURA LARKINS REFUSED.
Mr. Werlin was not authorized by the contract to transfer Petitioner
involuntarily. The purpose of any meeting with Mr. Werlin is suspect.
The Superintendent never made any attempt to supervise
Mr. Werlin. She left Mrs. Larkins in his personal control,
even after Mrs. Larkins had filed grievances and written
letters ( Exhibit 41) about his hostile and dishonest and
illegal behavior.
The only meetings Mrs. Larkins refused to attend were
those that would be alone with Mr. Werlin. It is shameful
that both the Superintendent and the Board completely
ignored Petitioner’s serious accusations against Mr.
Werlin. He did not offer to meet with her with others
present until after he had (retroactively) suspended her
without pay.
K. SEPTEMBER 2001
PETITIONER AND HER ATTORNEY EACH WROTE SEVERAL
LETTERS TO THE DISTRICT REGARDING THE DANGER TO
PETITIONER FROM MR. WERLIN.
The Superintendent continued to refuse to supervise
Werlin.
WERLIN BEGAN FAXING MAURA LARKINS WHEN HER
LAWYER WAS OUT OF TOWN, DEMANDING THAT MRS.
LARKINS COME IN WITHOUT HER LAWYER AND MEET
WITH HIM; MAURA LARKINS REFUSED.
Mr. Werlin was not authorized by the contract to transfer Petitioner
involuntarily. The purpose of any meeting with Mr. Werlin is suspect.
The Superintendent never made any attempt to supervise
Mr. Werlin. She left Mrs. Larkins in his personal control,
even after Mrs. Larkins had filed grievances and written
letters ( Exhibit 41) about his hostile and dishonest and
illegal behavior.
The only meetings Mrs. Larkins refused to attend were
those that would be alone with Mr. Werlin. It is shameful
that both the Superintendent and the Board completely
ignored Petitioner’s serious accusations against Mr.
Werlin. He did not offer to meet with her with others
present until after he had (retroactively) suspended her
without pay.
K. SEPTEMBER 2001
PETITIONER AND HER ATTORNEY EACH WROTE SEVERAL
LETTERS TO THE DISTRICT REGARDING THE DANGER TO
PETITIONER FROM MR. WERLIN.
The Superintendent continued to refuse to supervise
Werlin.
| .......It is shameful that both Superintendent Libia Gil and the Board completely ignored Petitioner’s serious accusations against Mr. Werlin. Werlin did not offer to meet with Mrs. Larkins with others present until after he had (retroactively) suspended her without pay. |
Illegal OAH
Decision
Page 10
Decision
Page 10
mauralarkins.com
San Diego
Education Report
Education Report
 |
| |
 |
| Page 10 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| Mr. Werlin was not authorized by the contract to transfer Maura Larkins involuntarily. The purpose of any meeting with Mr. Werlin is suspect. |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |