5. Linda Watson deposition
Q. Did you call Rick Werlin at his home at any time?
A. No.
Attorney Kelly Angell Minnehan: Ms. Watson indicated to me on the break that she needs to
make a correction to earlier testimony.
A. ...I'm pretty sure that if I did, and I'm not even sure I did, that it was one time to his house
on a weekend...
Q. Were you curious as to what my behavior might have been that caused them to fear for
their lives? Gina Boyd: (long pause) I guess...I don't know...
101 pages
includes the following
depositions:
Linda Watson (contd.)
Teresa Coffey
99 pages
includes depositions of:
Richard Denmon
Attorney Elizabeth
Schulman,
Maura Larkins
Related
depositions
posted by US
District Court
125-page Federal Court
Exhibit
Depositions of Sam
Gross,Santa Barbara
Sheriff's Commander;
Gina Boyd;
Peg "Peggie" Myers
100 pages
includes the following
depositions:
Richard Werlin
Robin Donlan
72 pages includes:
Robin Donlan (contd)
Maura Larkins,
Linda Watson
Apparently, this deposition didn't go as well as Stutz expected. Dan Shinoff refused to show
up for his deposition. Maura Larkins filed a Motion to Compel.
Depositions and subpoenas
The Backstory of
this lawsuit
SDCOE
Motions
April 6, 2009 Stutz Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude
Testimony Related to Issues of Liability
I am not Daniel Ellsburg but that
hasn't stopped Stutz law firm from
launching an attack on my First
Amendment rights reminiscent of the
actions of Richard Nixon in the
Pentagon Papers case.
Strangely, the judge in my case
(Judith Hayes) seems unaware of
the 1971 Supreme Court decision
that ruled that even the Top Secret
documents published by the New
York Times did not meet the high
standard for justification of prior
restraint: "Prior restraints require an
unusually heavy justification under
the First Amendment."
Link to Supreme Court decision
article
Two years later Chief Justice Burger
wrote: "Every member of the Court,
tacitly or explicitly, accepted
the...condemnation of prior
restraints as presumptively
unconstitutional."
"...[T]he General Counsel of The
Times said that the promise to obey
the injunction was ill-conceived. In
later cases the Times reserved to
itself the right to decide whether it
would obey an injunction directed
against publication."
In Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart,
Chief Justice Burger wrote that the
question was whether "the gravity
of the 'evil', discounted by its
improbability, justifies invasion of
free speech."
Stutz law firm--and Judge Judith
Hayes--seem determined to shut
down my website before the Court
of Appeal can rule in my favor.
--Maura Larkins
Defamation case law
Declarations
101 pages includes the following depositions: Teresa Coffey
99 pages includes depositions of: Richard Denmon Attorney Elizabeth Schulman, Maura Larkins
|
125-page Federal Court Exhibit Depositions of Sam Gross,Santa Barbara Sheriff's Commander; Gina Boyd; Peg "Peggie" Myers
100 pages includes the following depositions: Richard Werlin Robin Donlan
72 pages includes: Robin Donlan (contd) Maura Larkins, Linda Watson
|
Update August 5, 2011
Complaints and Answer
San Diego Education Report
|
San Diego
Education Report
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz v. Maura Larkins defamation
lawsuit regarding this website
3. 2012 Petition for Writ re Sanctions--D062214
Court transcripts