| ... |
| San Diego Education Report |
| SDER |
San Diego
Education Report
Education Report
| SDER |
| SDER |
| SDER |
| San Diego Education Report |
| SDER |
San Diego
Education Report
Education Report
| SDER |
| SDER |
| SDER |
Sept. 4, 2012 Appeal re Denial of Motion to Dissolve Injunction--D062738
Why This Website
Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation
SDCOE
CVESD
Castle Park
Elementary School
Law Enforcement
CTA
CVE
Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz
Silence is Golden
Schools and Violence
Office Admin Hearings
Larkins OAH Hearing
Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation
SDCOE
CVESD
Castle Park
Elementary School
Law Enforcement
CTA
CVE
Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz
Silence is Golden
Schools and Violence
Office Admin Hearings
Larkins OAH Hearing
Appellant's Appendix (Exhibits)
[Each pdf volume takes about 5 minutes to download]
Volume 8 contains the exhibits that were illegally destroyed by
someone at the San Diego Superior Court, including 9 exhibits
of Plaintiff and 29 exhibits of Defendant (author of this website)
Exhibit 95a--Plaintiff's pleading
Stutz 8-page pleading filed July 10, 2013 re state of website 1618-1628
for July 27, 2012 hearing on 3rd Motion o Strike; Holtz declaration;
Proof of service and Norco delivery report; Notice of Lodgment
Exhibits A-I [total 9 exhibits] 1629-1701
[These exhibits are missing from court file while the case is
still active]
Exhibit 95b--Defendant's pleading
Defendant’s 8-page response to Stutz pleading re state of website pages
for July 27, 2012 continued hearing on Motion to Strike (July 17, 2012 filed)
Declaration
[The following exhibits are missing from the court file
while the case is still active.]
Exhibit 18 Complete 14-page Defendant’s brief for July 27, 2012
hearing re Motion to Strike Defendant asks the court
to file and consider for the July 27, 2012 hearing re
Motion to Strike decision
Newspaper articles
Exhibit 19 “A History of Death Threats, Scandal and Sewage-
Tainted Water” October 16, 2011, Rob Davis,
Voice of San Diego
Exhibit 20a “Judge's tentative ruling disqualifies MCC attorneys from
Hatoff case” August 24, 2007 By PHILIP K. IRELAND
North County Times
Exhibit 20b “Teacher's suit vs. MiraCosta awaits ruling” Aug 25, 2007 By
Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
Exhibit 21 “Judge reverses decision on attorneys in MiraCosta case” Sept
6, 2007 By Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
Exhibit 22 “Longtime MiraCosta College official placed on leave” August 26,
2006 By: DAVID GARRICK North County Times
“MCC settles with former administrator for $500K” Dec. 12, 2007 By PHILIP K.
IRELAND North County Times
Exhibit 23 “Balboa Park plan to clear cars, parking is approved” U-T San Diego,
July 9, 2012 Letters: Balboa Park debate continues” U-T San Diego, July 12, 2012
Exhibit 24 “The Schoolhouse Lawyer Who Helped Hire His Overseer” by Emily
Alpert March 3, 2009”
Defendant’s websites and blogs
Exhibit 25a “I’m wondering if there’s anything you hold sacred…” page 8
out of 16 of http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.html
Exhibit 25b page 10 out of 16 http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.
html
Exhibit 26 Pages 3 and 4 of the webpage at http://mauralarkins.
com/MiraCostaShinoff.html
Exhibit 27a Pages 11 and 12 of webpage at http://:www sandiegoeducationreport.
org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
printed out by Defendant before erasing letter Stutz
complained about
Exhibit 27b Pages 10- 12 http://www.sandiego educationreport.
org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
printed out after I erased two quotes
Exhibit 29 Page 1 http:// sandiegoeducationreport.org/DepoMLpp105-115.html
after I erased (compare to Plaintiff Exhibit G)
Exhibit 30a printed July 7, 2012 http://learningboosters.blogspot.
com/2008/11/guhsd-attorney-dan-shinoff-admits-to.html
(compare to Plaintiff Exhibit H)
Exhibit 30b printed July 7, 2012 http://learningboosters.blogspot.com/2008/11/
guhsd-attorney-dan-shinoff-admits-to.html
Exhibit 31 page 1 BJ Freeman lawsuit webpage sandiegoeducationreport.
net/BJFreeman.html
Emails and letters
Exhibit 32 Jul. 2, 2012 –July 17, 2012 letters and emails to Plaintiff regarding
contempt sanctions
Proof of Service of mailing sanctions check
Copy of check
[total 18 exhibits missing from court file from Larkins' special 8-page pleading]
95c Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice in support of
special 8-page pleading re Motion to Strike
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Letter from Daniel Shinoff to
Defendant included as Exhibit E from in
Mr. Shinoff’s Declaration in Support of Motion for Summary Adjudication heard Feb.
20, 2009 by
Judge Hayes in the instant case, #37-2007-
00076218-CU-DF-CTL
Exhibit 2 Complaint filed by Daniel Shinoff in County of San Francisco
on behalf of Christopher Crosier, the son of Mr. Shinoff’s
overseer at San Diego County Office of Education,
Diane Crosier
Exhibit 3 Defendant’s June 28, 2012 Petition for
Writ of Review, California Court of Appeal
(SEE NEW VOLUME)
VOLUME 9
Exhibit 4 Vista Unified School District v. B.J. Freeman
4a Plaintiff’s Opposition to Demurrer, 8 pages 1879-1925
4b Request for Dismissal by Shinoff/Abed,
2 pages
4c Case Management Statement, 5 pages
4d Reply in Support of Demurrer
4e Motion to strike portions of amended
complaint, 8 pages
4f Demurrer
Exhibit 5 Request for restraining order against Kathleen Elton 1926
Exhibit 6 Decision in case of Kayla—to show facts of Plaintiff’s court
filings
Exhibit 7 Aug. 22, 2003 Sixth Amended Complaint: Violation of Labor
Code section 432.7 [a criminal statute], etc. filed by Maura Larkins
Exhibit 8 Rodger Hartnett declaration regarding San Diego County
Office of Education
Exhibit 9 Judge Judith Hayes’ decision in Digital Cornerstone, Inc. v.
Kevin Carmony
Exhibit 10 July 17, 2012 Defendant’s ex parte request in this case
asking for clarification of injunction and asking that court reveal which statements it
found to be violations of injunction in its rulings of Aug. 7, 2009, Oct. 30, 2009, Dec.
11, 2009 (includes exhibit of “The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's Furies” by Leslie
Devaney, published by Voice of San Diego on December 12, 2005.)
Exhibit 11 Claudia Houston v. Daniel Shinoff, complaint for tortious
interference
[total 11 exhibits missing from Larkins' Request for Judicial Notice]
[Each pdf volume takes about 5 minutes to download]
Volume 8 contains the exhibits that were illegally destroyed by
someone at the San Diego Superior Court, including 9 exhibits
of Plaintiff and 29 exhibits of Defendant (author of this website)
Exhibit 95a--Plaintiff's pleading
Stutz 8-page pleading filed July 10, 2013 re state of website 1618-1628
for July 27, 2012 hearing on 3rd Motion o Strike; Holtz declaration;
Proof of service and Norco delivery report; Notice of Lodgment
Exhibits A-I [total 9 exhibits] 1629-1701
[These exhibits are missing from court file while the case is
still active]
Exhibit 95b--Defendant's pleading
Defendant’s 8-page response to Stutz pleading re state of website pages
for July 27, 2012 continued hearing on Motion to Strike (July 17, 2012 filed)
Declaration
[The following exhibits are missing from the court file
while the case is still active.]
Exhibit 18 Complete 14-page Defendant’s brief for July 27, 2012
hearing re Motion to Strike Defendant asks the court
to file and consider for the July 27, 2012 hearing re
Motion to Strike decision
Newspaper articles
Exhibit 19 “A History of Death Threats, Scandal and Sewage-
Tainted Water” October 16, 2011, Rob Davis,
Voice of San Diego
Exhibit 20a “Judge's tentative ruling disqualifies MCC attorneys from
Hatoff case” August 24, 2007 By PHILIP K. IRELAND
North County Times
Exhibit 20b “Teacher's suit vs. MiraCosta awaits ruling” Aug 25, 2007 By
Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
Exhibit 21 “Judge reverses decision on attorneys in MiraCosta case” Sept
6, 2007 By Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
Exhibit 22 “Longtime MiraCosta College official placed on leave” August 26,
2006 By: DAVID GARRICK North County Times
“MCC settles with former administrator for $500K” Dec. 12, 2007 By PHILIP K.
IRELAND North County Times
Exhibit 23 “Balboa Park plan to clear cars, parking is approved” U-T San Diego,
July 9, 2012 Letters: Balboa Park debate continues” U-T San Diego, July 12, 2012
Exhibit 24 “The Schoolhouse Lawyer Who Helped Hire His Overseer” by Emily
Alpert March 3, 2009”
Defendant’s websites and blogs
Exhibit 25a “I’m wondering if there’s anything you hold sacred…” page 8
out of 16 of http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.html
Exhibit 25b page 10 out of 16 http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.
html
Exhibit 26 Pages 3 and 4 of the webpage at http://mauralarkins.
com/MiraCostaShinoff.html
Exhibit 27a Pages 11 and 12 of webpage at http://:www sandiegoeducationreport.
org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
printed out by Defendant before erasing letter Stutz
complained about
Exhibit 27b Pages 10- 12 http://www.sandiego educationreport.
org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
printed out after I erased two quotes
Exhibit 29 Page 1 http:// sandiegoeducationreport.org/DepoMLpp105-115.html
after I erased (compare to Plaintiff Exhibit G)
Exhibit 30a printed July 7, 2012 http://learningboosters.blogspot.
com/2008/11/guhsd-attorney-dan-shinoff-admits-to.html
(compare to Plaintiff Exhibit H)
Exhibit 30b printed July 7, 2012 http://learningboosters.blogspot.com/2008/11/
guhsd-attorney-dan-shinoff-admits-to.html
Exhibit 31 page 1 BJ Freeman lawsuit webpage sandiegoeducationreport.
net/BJFreeman.html
Emails and letters
Exhibit 32 Jul. 2, 2012 –July 17, 2012 letters and emails to Plaintiff regarding
contempt sanctions
Proof of Service of mailing sanctions check
Copy of check
[total 18 exhibits missing from court file from Larkins' special 8-page pleading]
95c Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice in support of
special 8-page pleading re Motion to Strike
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Letter from Daniel Shinoff to
Defendant included as Exhibit E from in
Mr. Shinoff’s Declaration in Support of Motion for Summary Adjudication heard Feb.
20, 2009 by
Judge Hayes in the instant case, #37-2007-
00076218-CU-DF-CTL
Exhibit 2 Complaint filed by Daniel Shinoff in County of San Francisco
on behalf of Christopher Crosier, the son of Mr. Shinoff’s
overseer at San Diego County Office of Education,
Diane Crosier
Exhibit 3 Defendant’s June 28, 2012 Petition for
Writ of Review, California Court of Appeal
(SEE NEW VOLUME)
VOLUME 9
Exhibit 4 Vista Unified School District v. B.J. Freeman
4a Plaintiff’s Opposition to Demurrer, 8 pages 1879-1925
4b Request for Dismissal by Shinoff/Abed,
2 pages
4c Case Management Statement, 5 pages
4d Reply in Support of Demurrer
4e Motion to strike portions of amended
complaint, 8 pages
4f Demurrer
Exhibit 5 Request for restraining order against Kathleen Elton 1926
Exhibit 6 Decision in case of Kayla—to show facts of Plaintiff’s court
filings
Exhibit 7 Aug. 22, 2003 Sixth Amended Complaint: Violation of Labor
Code section 432.7 [a criminal statute], etc. filed by Maura Larkins
Exhibit 8 Rodger Hartnett declaration regarding San Diego County
Office of Education
Exhibit 9 Judge Judith Hayes’ decision in Digital Cornerstone, Inc. v.
Kevin Carmony
Exhibit 10 July 17, 2012 Defendant’s ex parte request in this case
asking for clarification of injunction and asking that court reveal which statements it
found to be violations of injunction in its rulings of Aug. 7, 2009, Oct. 30, 2009, Dec.
11, 2009 (includes exhibit of “The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's Furies” by Leslie
Devaney, published by Voice of San Diego on December 12, 2005.)
Exhibit 11 Claudia Houston v. Daniel Shinoff, complaint for tortious
interference
[total 11 exhibits missing from Larkins' Request for Judicial Notice]
It appears that somebody at the San Diego Superior Court doesn't want this author
(Maura Larkins) to be able to appeal Judge Judith Hayes' order granting Stutz Artiano
Shinoff & Holtz' Motion to Strike Answer.
(Maura Larkins) to be able to appeal Judge Judith Hayes' order granting Stutz Artiano
Shinoff & Holtz' Motion to Strike Answer.
Fortunately, the exhibits are in the Appendix for the Sept. 4, 2012 Appeal re Denial of Motion
to Dissolve Injunction (see below). I plan to file that appeal very soon.
But somebody also wanted to prevent me from filing the appeal below, regarding an
injunction. A bizzare hoax was perpetrated in an unsuccessful effort to default this
appeal.
to Dissolve Injunction (see below). I plan to file that appeal very soon.
But somebody also wanted to prevent me from filing the appeal below, regarding an
injunction. A bizzare hoax was perpetrated in an unsuccessful effort to default this
appeal.
Pages
(Page numbers
refer to handwritten
number on lower
right corner of each
page)
(Page numbers
refer to handwritten
number on lower
right corner of each
page)
ALL PLEADINGS AND EXHIBITS
IN STUTZ V. LARKINS
Appellant's Appendix
(Each pdf volume takes about 5
minutes to download)
IN STUTZ V. LARKINS
Appellant's Appendix
(Each pdf volume takes about 5
minutes to download)
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
Volume 5
Volume 6
38 exhibits pertaining to the Motion to Strike have disappeared!
Court transcripts