| Robin Donlan responded to only one interrogatory--eight months after it was propounded, after she had been dismissed from the case, and after Maura Larkins had paid a detective to find out the information! |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| June 23, 2003 CVESD and Stutz rely on illegal decision |
December 17, 2004 Stutz wants depositions kept secret
October
2004
2004
| CVESD and Stutz illegally silence all CVESD employees regarding Larkins case |
| Illegally hiding the truth, including intimidation of witnesses and subornation of perjury |
| Kelly Angell told the court again and again that discovery "would be dangerous to her clients." |
| Perjured declaration that Stutz used to get Maura Larkins case dismissed, and letter from the Sheriff of Santa Barbara saying that the declaration is false |
Stutz got deposition date changed at ex
parte regarding issue that had been
resolved, after Larkins had complied
with all requests necessary for resolution
parte regarding issue that had been
resolved, after Larkins had complied
with all requests necessary for resolution
| Documents in Larkins v. CVESD (CVESD hired Stutz law firm to represent the interests of those who engaged in illegal actions) |
| Ex-parte conference Sept. 27, 2004 |
| Application served on Larkins by Stutz at 3:45 p.m. on Fri. Sept. 24, 2004 although Kelly Angell knew since Sept. 21, 2004 that Sept. 27, 2004 would be the hearing date. Also, Angell did not serve the last 16 pages. |
| Stutz hides the truth from the court |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Daniel Shinoff: Not a public figure? |
This is what CVESD and SDCOE-JPA paid Stutz law firm to do: |
| Chula Vista Elementary School District |
| Stutz, Artiano Shinoff & Holtz |
| SAN DIEGO EDUCATION REPORT |