The author of this website was ordered to remove every mention of Stutz law firm
from her websites, and to never mention its name again. Is the San Diego Superior
Court having a bit of a problem with the US Constitution?
Stutz' Proposed order signed and entered on December 11, 2009
Why did Stutz fail to serve a Notice of Entry of this order until Maura Larkins asked about it on
January 20, 2010?
Hiding documents from Maura Larkins was a frequently-used tactic by Stutz law firm in this
case. The December 11, 2009 order was the fourth document that Stutz failed to serve
properly.
But Stutz seems to have kicked itself on the backside. Maura Larkins didn't realize that
injunctions could be appealed until the second week of March 2010. Thanks to Stutz'
shenanigans, this was soon enough to file a timely appeal.
Stutz' January 20, 2010 Notice of Entry
Question: What would
motivate a conservative San
Diego Superior Court judge
to use unconstitutional
means to try to shut down a
political website?
Answer: Could it be this
page? Patrick O'Toole
perhaps doesn't like this
website. How much contact
does he have with Judge
Hayes?
The injunction below was overturned by the California Court of
Appeal on August 5, 2011
Update:
"The court amends the injunction to reflect that Defendant is ordered to remove from her website(s) any and all reference to Plaintiff or any of it's (sic) former or current employees within 20 days."
|
San Diego Education Report
|
San Diego
Education Report