An Open Letter to Cheryl Cox about Gaylord 
Developers and Cheryl's Allegation of Blackmail
      
      July 8, 2007
Dear Cheryl:
It was odd that you accused the unions of blackmail regarding the Gaylord 
project that failed in Chula Vista. Whatever did you mean when you talked 
about blackmail on TV on January 6, 2007?
Here's how Merriam-Webster defines blackmail:
"Extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal 
prosecution."
Now Cheryl, did the unions do that? Does Gaylord (or you?) have a dirty 
secret that the unions threatened to expose? Isn't it really that you are 
blackmailing the unions by blaming them for the deal gone sour, when the 
true reasons have to do with envirmonmental problems?
Let me assure you, Cheryl, that if anyone is trying to blackmail you, the 
perfect defense against blackmail is to come clean in public, apologize, 
repair the harm you’ve done.
You know what I suspect? I suspect you were thinking about me and my 
pending lawsuit against you when the word “blackmail” popped out of your 
mouth so awkwardly. It’s your guilt that is talking, and your contempt for 
the law. You won’t give an inch, you won’t say you’re sorry, you just point 
the finger at someone else.
Instead of admitting you broke the law, you charge that someone who talks 
about your violations of law in public is “blackmailing” you. But if someone 
talks about your secrets PUBLICLY, Cheryl, that means they’re NOT 
blackmailing you. Me, for example. I believe that someone as dishonest and 
contemptuous of the law as you should not have control over public policy 
and public dollars. Of course, you have the option of becoming an honest 
person who respects the law. I urge you to do so. Right now you’re not 
making a wise choice, Cheryl.
Let’s see, who could really blackmail you? The press! Bonnie Dumanis! 
They are keeping your secrets. It sure isn’t me. Why don’t you do the right 
thing, and apologize, and come clean about what you and your lawyers did 
to Chula Vista Elementary School District and Castle Park Elementary. It 
would help taxpayers all over San Diego county. Your lawyer Dan Shinoff 
has gone on to cause even more trouble at MiraCosta College than he did at 
CVESD. The price tag for his folly was $3 million at MiraCosta.
It was a shame that you couldn’t tell the truth in the "Castle Park Five" 
case at CVESD. You wasted tax dollars once again. You forced 
Superintendent Lowell Billings to hide the truth about Robin Donlan and her 
friends, so you lost. Shame on you for wasting so many hundreds of 
thousands tax dollars on multiple criminal cover-ups.
Best regards,
Maura Larkins
      
      
      
        
          
            | San Diego Education Report 
 | 
        
       
      
      San Diego 
Education Report
      
      
      
      
            
        
          
            | San Diego Education Report 
 | 
        
       
      
      San Diego 
Education Report