Dishonesty re patient conditions

Is Kaiser criticising others for imitating its own practices?  
See Kaiser urology

Ex-employees say Prime hospitals stretch to keep
California Watch
July 23, 2011
Christina Jewett

Deciding when a patient is stable enough to leave a hospital is difficult for any doctor,
but some former employees of Prime Healthcare Services say the chain has gone to
extreme lengths to keep patients at their medical facilities.

Court testimony shows that Dr. Panch Jeyakumar, former medical director at Prime’s
Desert Valley Hospital in Victorville, has accused the chain’s founder and board
chairman, Dr. Prem Reddy, of overstating one patient’s level of illness in “an economic

Jeyakumar testified that he and two other physicians, including a cardiologist, believed
that one patient who came to Desert Valley had endured a fainting spell.

But Reddy, who had practiced as a cardiologist, got involved in the case and wrote on a
patient medical record: “post cardiac arrest – sudden death.”

Reddy exaggerated the diagnosis to ensure that the patient appeared too sick to be
transferred to a Kaiser Permanente hospital, Jeyakumar said, recalling a discussion
about the patient during a Feb. 13, 2003, meeting. Other nurse managers gave similar
testimony at the trial.

Prime officials would not respond to requests for comment. In testimony, Reddy said he
reached the “cardiac death” diagnosis because of the patient’s family history, though
he did not document the history in the patient medical record, testimony shows. He also
testified that he was angry that Jeyakumar accused him of doing something “immoral,
unethical, illegal for a few dollars.”

Kaiser and the Heritage Provider Network have claimed in lawsuits that Prime is playing
tug of war with their clients, rendering care without reaching out to their usual doctor or
reviewing their medical histories.

Under laws governing how insured patients are treated in emergency rooms, hospital
doctors are obligated to decide when an out-of-network patient is “stable.” Once a
patient reaches that point, hospitals must give insurance-company doctors information
so they can decide whether to send an ambulance to get the patient or authorize the
hospital to continue treatment.

Kaiser and Heritage have accused Prime of pressuring doctors not to deem patients
“stable” at all during their stay or until hours before they are sent home – and then
sending big bills to managed care firms.

Prime denies the latest accusations in legal filings, saying Kaiser’s claims are
“demonstrably false” and has accused Kaiser of being too aggressive in bringing its
patients back to network hospitals.

Prime accuses Heritage of inappropriately arguing that patients were stable. Both cases
are pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Ex-employee discusses backdating
In their own words

Transcripts from court and public hearing testimony:
Making emergency care profitable
Prime's tense relations with insurers
React & Act
How do doctors decide which patients to admit?
Become a Source

Inform our reporting: Have you visited a California emergency room?
Questions we're asking
Sign up
Report an error: See something wrong in this story?
E-mail our editors.

Another former Prime employee said she was charged with asking doctors to
“backdate” medical records to get payment from Kaiser. The accusation came from
Cheri Boka, who oversaw collections for four Orange County Prime hospitals for 10
months ending in April 2010.

Boka said she called Kaiser to ask about docked payment for patients who came to
Prime emergency rooms and were admitted to a hospital floor. She repeatedly learned
that Kaiser refused to pay because Prime had not followed regulations that call for
Prime staff to discuss care decisions.

In as many as 50 cases, Boka said, her supervisor asked her to copy patient medical
records and send them with a blank form labeled “unstable for transfer” to doctors at
several Prime hospitals.

The doctors, Boka said, were expected to backdate the form and document information
showing that the patients were too medically fragile at the time of treatment to be
transferred t o a Kaiser facility.

With the signed forms in hand, Boka said she was expected to submit the bills to Kaiser
for the second time.

“It was horrifying,” said Boka, who settled a wrongful termination suit against Prime on
an unrelated matter. “I said, ‘This is not right. We’re backdating records.’ ”

Boka said in March that she testified this year about the arrangement in a deposition
for Kaiser after the firm contacted her.

A Kaiser counter-lawsuit echoes Boka’s account, saying Prime will seek payment and
insert documentation in a medical record to appear as though a doctor made an on-the-
spot decision that a patient was not healthy enough to be moved.

“In truth, there has been no such determination,” the lawsuit contends.

The Heritage cross-complaint also accuses Prime of “intentional mislabeling” of patients
as “unstable” for transfer even though the patients are well enough to go back into
managed care facilities.

Prime has denied allegations in both lawsuits and said Heritage inappropriately claimed
that patients were stable to be transferred when they were not.

During a hearing about a proposed hospital sale, Assemblyman Jose Solorio, D-Santa
Ana, testified that it is “against California law” to admit patients through the emergency
room without talking to insurers.

“Dr. Reddy does this every day in every one of his hospitals,” Solorio said. “In fact, this
is how he gets most of his admissions. This should be of concern to the (state).”
Thank Heaven for
Insurance Companies blog
Doctors don't
want to discuss

I have seen 4 doctors at
Kaiser ENT about
headaches and sinus pain,
even the department head.
All said there was no
problem and
they would
not look at my MRI. Every
doctor that looks at the
MRI gets it dismissed
MRI clearly shows a

David of Stackbridge, GA

Cardiology score card
Retaliation by Kaiser
Missing Medical Records
Warnings deleted from abnormal
test results
Conflicts of interest
Failure to diagnose
Cases and news
missing x-rays
Peer review
Paul Bernstein and writers
Remediating failure to diagnose
Mary Ann Barnes
Kaiser executives
George Halvorson, Kaiser CEO
Profits grow as Kaiser cuts care
Blog: Kaiser Permanente
Dr. Eugene Rhee, chief
of urology
Lynette Seid, CFO San Diego
X-rays (VUCG)
James G. Malone
Dave Horton
Comparison San Diego  hospitals
Kaiser Permanente links
Kaiser department rankings
Cancer score card
Diagnostic Imaging
Medical Records
US Health Insurance companies
consent form
Healthcare reform
KP On Call
Lawyers and doctors
Yvonne Hanzen
Nathaniel L. Oubré, Jr.
Dr. Huathin Khaw
Dr. Jacob Birnbaum
Dr. Catherine Cheng
Dr. Jae Kyo Lee
Marina Baroff
Bertha Aviles
Garfield Specialty Center
Dr. Hamid Safari
Code of silence

Member Services
Conahan v. Sebelius and Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
Gee v. SCPMG
Standard of care
Gynecology rankings
Medical School rankings
Board Certification
Problems at Garfield Center in
Kearny Mesa
Bad faith denial of coverage
Cases and news
Kagnoff, Marcia
Prime Healthcare v. Kaiser
Patient advocates
Gilbert Kenneth Moran
Doctors who cause death
Doctors who go along
with Kaiser tactics
Doctors in charge of
Robert Pearl
Filing a complaint
Prime Healthcare heart
failure rates--is Prime worse
than Kaiser Permanente?
San Diego Education Report
San Diego
Education Report
San Diego Education Report
San Diego
Education Report