FEB 4 05 Larkins sent tort claim
| Maura Larkins v. Chula Vista Elementary School District and Related Case Documents |
| Sheriff's deputy Michael Carlson and his sister |
| Vence Donlan Wireless Facilities stock fraud |
| Letter to CVE President Gina Boyd |
| CVESD |
| San Diego Superior Court |
| CTA |
| PERB/OAH |
| January 2008 |
| SEPT 2005 2005-2006 School year begins |
| March 12 02 Larkins served CVESD with lawsuit May 24 Oral arg Jeffery Morris ? July 5 CMC Jeffery Morris c Aug 2 CMC David A. Stevens no Oct 4 CMC Jeffery Morris c Dec 31 Disc conf Kelly Angell c |
Jan. 22, 2003 oral arg c
Jan. 24 CMC c
Feb. 7 CMC c
March 28 CMC c
April 10 ex parte c
May 19 served 5th Amended
Complaint
June 2 Larkins filed Opposition
to Motion for Protective Order
June 4 Doig called
June 13 Protective Order
granted to CVESD et al
June 23 Stutz declares support for
illegal OAH decision
Kelly Angell illegally obtained
medical records
JULY 7 03 Ruling on 5AC demurrer
July 11 oral arguments c
July 18 CMC c
Aug 8 hearing re file 6AC
August 15 tentative ruling 6AC
Aug 22
Arg re 6AC Kelly Angell c
Kelly Angell tells bald-faced lies to
Judge Nevitt; 6AC filed re violation
of Labor Code 432.7
DEC letter to Angell re fax service
Jan. 24 CMC c
Feb. 7 CMC c
March 28 CMC c
April 10 ex parte c
May 19 served 5th Amended
Complaint
June 2 Larkins filed Opposition
to Motion for Protective Order
June 4 Doig called
June 13 Protective Order
granted to CVESD et al
June 23 Stutz declares support for
illegal OAH decision
Kelly Angell illegally obtained
medical records
JULY 7 03 Ruling on 5AC demurrer
July 11 oral arguments c
July 18 CMC c
Aug 8 hearing re file 6AC
August 15 tentative ruling 6AC
Aug 22
Arg re 6AC Kelly Angell c
Kelly Angell tells bald-faced lies to
Judge Nevitt; 6AC filed re violation
of Labor Code 432.7
DEC letter to Angell re fax service
Jan 6 04 filed Michael Carlson
default
JAN 23 04 hearing on Stutz demurrer
and motion to strike
February 11 oral arguments
February 20 CMC
March 17 ex parte
protective
March 22 Gina Boyd
deposition
March 29 Michael Hersh
MEET AND CONFER LETTER
REGARDING YOUR REFUSAL TO
ALLOW GINA BOYD TO ANSWER
DEPOSITION QUESTIONS
April Motion to Compel Gina Boyd
April 30 Linda Watson deposition
MAY 13 Case consolidation hearing
June/July CVESD witnesses
unavailable
June 8 04 Ruling: Gina Boyd can
walk out of deposition; compare to
DEC 3 04 ruling
July 23 04 CTA demurrer and motion
to strike hearing
July CVESD documents missing
AUG 8 03 hearing re Stutz pointless
opposition to file 6AC
August 27 CMC
AUG "Castle Park Five" transferred
out of Castle Park Elementary
Stutz clients talked to the press
about Castle Park Elementary, as did
the clients of CTA lawyers that were
working with Stutz
default
JAN 23 04 hearing on Stutz demurrer
and motion to strike
February 11 oral arguments
February 20 CMC
March 17 ex parte
protective
March 22 Gina Boyd
deposition
March 29 Michael Hersh
MEET AND CONFER LETTER
REGARDING YOUR REFUSAL TO
ALLOW GINA BOYD TO ANSWER
DEPOSITION QUESTIONS
April Motion to Compel Gina Boyd
April 30 Linda Watson deposition
MAY 13 Case consolidation hearing
June/July CVESD witnesses
unavailable
June 8 04 Ruling: Gina Boyd can
walk out of deposition; compare to
DEC 3 04 ruling
July 23 04 CTA demurrer and motion
to strike hearing
July CVESD documents missing
AUG 8 03 hearing re Stutz pointless
opposition to file 6AC
August 27 CMC
AUG "Castle Park Five" transferred
out of Castle Park Elementary
Stutz clients talked to the press
about Castle Park Elementary, as did
the clients of CTA lawyers that were
working with Stutz
| January 2006 |
| January 2007 |
| March 2004 San Diego Union Tribune informed of Maura Larkins case |
| October 5, 2007 CVESD lawyers Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz file suit for defamation against Maura Larkins for statements on this blog |
| Map of Site of Education Reform Report |
| CTA attorneyMichael Hersh failed to communicate appropriately with clients; did not even show CVE board a copy of my lawsuit |
| Larkins letter to SDUT-not published |
| FEB 12 02 Larkins met with Richard Werlin, Cindy Miller, Gretchen Donndelinger and CVE President Gina Boyd. APRIL 3 Fax to Werlin APRIL 4 Letter from Werlin APRIL 16 Alan Smith report APRIL 20 Linda Watson report May 22 Jim Groth's hoax grievance JULY 18 Tim O'Neill hoax letter and Libby Gil response AUG 13 Meeting at CVESD SEP 27 Larkins' offer to meet Gil SEP 27 Larkins' complaint re Werlin SEP 28 letter to Werlin OCT 3 To Gil regarding ban OCT 4 Larkins files tort claim Daniel Shinoff becomes involved OCT 5 Liba Gil letter to Larkins Larkins' response to Gil NOV 12 Larkins' Stop pay grievance NOV 13 Larkins' Transfer grievance NOV 13 Larkins' Safety grievance NOV 14 Werlin sends threat to dismiss in violation of Labor Code 1102.5 NOV15 Cindy Miller cuts off benefits |
MAR 29 meet and confer Hersh
| JAN 16 02 Letter to atty Ann Smith JAN 17 02 Letter to Ann M. Smith JAN 23 02 Reprisal grievance (CVE and Jim Groth refused to support grievance against severe retaliation) JAN 26 Grievance re no response (CVE grievance chair Jim Groth refused to support Larkins' right to receive a response to her grievance.) JAN 26 Letter to CTA president Wayne Johnson |
| Jan 6 through Jan 10 03 Maura Larkins OAH hearing |
JAN 23 02 Reprisal grievance
JAN 26 Grievance re no response
JAN 26 Grievance re no response
| SDCOE |
| After reports that he violated the law, Richard Werlin was kept as liaison between the school board and Stutz law firm and other lawyers. |
FEB/MARCH Shinoff invoice MISSING APRIL 24 $3,130 Shinoff invoice MAY 21 $10,092 Shinoff invoice JUNE 12 $3,671 Shinoff invoice JULY 29 $2,536 Shinoff invoice AUGUST $2,064 Shinoff invoice SEP 19 02 $1,247 Shinoff invoice OCTOBER INVOICE MISSING NOVEMBER $5,783 Shinoff invoice DECEMBER INVOICE MISSING |
| 2004-2005 School year begins |
| January 2004 |
| Larkins response to non-party CVESD motion to dismiss suit |
| June 2003 SDUT wrote about indemnification of Otay Water District lawyers; Dan Shinoff defended the lawyers |
| JAN 23 Larkins complains of harassment, but complaint is never investigated |
| FEB 6 Jo Ellen Hamilton confronts Larkins regarding the complaint FEB 10 Hamilton and Linda Watson call Richard Werlin on Saturday night and say they fear for their lives |
| Stutz billed: JAN 23, 2004 $6,361.23 (and $2,192.43 balance forward!!!!) |
| NOV 12, 2004 Kelly Angell filed 2-inch thick motion asking, among other things, that Maura Larkins be arrested. How much money did SDCOE pay Stutz for this? |
| NOV 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| JAN 2005 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| SEPT 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| OCT 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| JULY 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| AUG 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| DEC 2004 Billable hours $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| FEB/MARCH 2005 $$$ ??? SDCOE refuses to produce the Stutz invoice for these months. Does Diane Crosier want to hide CVESD's indemnification of its lawyers, or does she want to hide that fact that her pal Dan Shinoff Stutz billed SDCOE illegally? |
| Stutz filed pleadings on behalf of NON-PARTY (!!!)CVESD to oppose Stutz being named in obstruction of justice causes of action. Who paid for these pleadings???? |
| NOV 2006 PTA president arrested, but Bonnie Dumanis and CVESD PTA never pressed charges. It wouldn't have been good for Cheryl Cox if the whole truth had come out in a trial. |
| Larkins filed and served PERB charge |
| Michelle Scharmach wrote letter that was predated by Werlin |
March 13 May 7 |
Larkins served CVESD lawsuit... CVESD mailed charges to Larkins Board voted to dismiss Larkins from employment (violation of Labor Code 1102.5 and also a criminal violation of Labor Code 432.7) |
| SEPT 30, 2004 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Kelly Angell for Robin Donlan and Linda Watson (later withdrawn) 1 1/2 inches thick |
| DEC 17, 2004 Stutz Motion to Quash Patrick Judd deposition subpoena signed |
| JAN 21, 2005 Hearing re Motion to Quash Patrick Judd deposition subpoena |
| DOES Motion JAN 7, 2005 Hearing re naming DOES-continued |
| DOES DEC 23, 2004 Stutz signed 1st opposition re naming Stutz as DOE 3/4 inches thick |
| DOES Motion DEC 9 04 Larkins filed motion to name Stutz as DOE |
| DOES MAR 2005 Stutz filed another "supplemental" opposition re naming DOES--This third DOE filing was 1/2 inch thick |
| Mar 2005 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| FEB 2005 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| DOES FEB 28 05 Stutz files another NON-PARTY opposition to naming DOES |
| MAY 2005 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| APRIL 2005 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| Transferred teachers demonstration on first day of school |
| Transferred teachers demonstration at Castle Park back-to-school night |
| January 2005 |
| DOES JAN 31 05 Larkins filed amendment to add Daniel Shinoff as DOE |
| January 2003 |
| January 2002 |
Jan 7 05 DOES
Hearing--continued
Jan 21 Quash hearing re Judd
deposition subpoena
Feb 2 Ex parte Kelly Angell says
CVESD indemnified lawyers
March 11 DOES hearing
Hearing--continued
Jan 21 Quash hearing re Judd
deposition subpoena
Feb 2 Ex parte Kelly Angell says
CVESD indemnified lawyers
March 11 DOES hearing
| MARCH 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| MAY 2004 Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| APRIL 2004 Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| JUNE 2004 Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| January 2001 |
| (This page is under construction. See also site map for mauralarkins.com.) |
| FEB 2004 Fraud complaint filed against CTA |
| DEC 13 04 Larkins filed objection to 20 pages of allegations added by Stutz to judgment in apparent effort to deceive the court |
| SEPT 04 Larkins opposition to Stutz ex parte |
| JUNE 02 Larkins hired Elizabeth Schulman |
| SEPT 10 02 Fax to CTA head counsel Beverly Tucker |
| CTA asks that all depositions in the case be sealed Larkins opposition |
| June/July 04 CVESD witnesses missing June 30 letter from Stutz July 2 letter to Stutz July 19 letter to Kelly Angell (Minnehan) |
| DEC 29 03 letter to Stutz |
| MARCH 16 04 letter to Stutz |
| MAR 17 04 to Stutz re only 1 interrogatory answered |
| CVESD cherry-picks documents to produce Atty Elizabeth Schulman makes no protest about missing Bate-stamped documents |
| July 04 Larkins asks again for missing Bate-stamped documents, but Stutz refuses to produce them |
DEC 10 03 letter to Stutz re Aug 22 03
| FEB 12 02 Boyd attended CVESD meeting and then later declared under oath that she either lost or accidentally threw away the notes for this meeting. APRIL 3 Fax to Werlin and CVE APRIL 22 letter to Boyd APRIL 25 Boyd practiced law without a license APRIL 27 letter to Boyd May 22 Jim Groth's hoax grievance MAY 28 letter to Boyd JULY 18 Tim O'Neill hoax letter and Libby Gil response AUG 13 Meeting at CVESD Boyd perjured declaration |
MAY 3 05 ex parte Kelly Angell ?
Hersh, Garvin and Angell attend
allegedly canceled hearing??!! n
SEPT 21 ex parte Michael Hersh ?
Items discussed:
1. Hersh's trick re obstruction: bogus
proposed order regarding dismissing
DOES 4th and 5th causes of action,
other causes already dismissed
2. Mr. Hersh told me that three
defendants' attorneys attended
conference that he had told me was
canceled and the court had taken off
calendar
Sept 23 CARLSON and GARVIN
prepare a false declaration
SEPT 27 ex parte Kelly Angell ?
Maura Larkins' confirmation letter
OCT 14 Order for Oct 28 Larkins
depostion Maura Larkins' faxed
agreement to attend October 28
deposition
OCT 15 EX PARTE THAT SHOULD
HAVE BEEN CANCELED WHEN
LARKINS AGREED TO DEPOSITION
DATE; KELLY ANGELL GOT
DEPOSITION DATE CHANGED TO A
DATE ON WHICH SHE KNEW LARKINS
WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND
OCT 25 Larkins deposition
LARKINS HAD TO LEAVE EARLY
NOV 3 CMC Rohrbacher c
NOV 4 Stutz suborns perjury at
Robin Donlan deposition
DEC 9 Larkins objection
DEC 17 CVESD & STUTZ WANT YET
ANOTHER PROTECTIVE ORDER
allegedly canceled hearing??!! n
SEPT 21 ex parte Michael Hersh ?
Items discussed:
1. Hersh's trick re obstruction: bogus
proposed order regarding dismissing
DOES 4th and 5th causes of action,
other causes already dismissed
2. Mr. Hersh told me that three
defendants' attorneys attended
conference that he had told me was
canceled and the court had taken off
calendar
Sept 23 CARLSON and GARVIN
prepare a false declaration
SEPT 27 ex parte Kelly Angell ?
Maura Larkins' confirmation letter
OCT 14 Order for Oct 28 Larkins
depostion Maura Larkins' faxed
agreement to attend October 28
deposition
OCT 15 EX PARTE THAT SHOULD
HAVE BEEN CANCELED WHEN
LARKINS AGREED TO DEPOSITION
DATE; KELLY ANGELL GOT
DEPOSITION DATE CHANGED TO A
DATE ON WHICH SHE KNEW LARKINS
WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND
OCT 25 Larkins deposition
LARKINS HAD TO LEAVE EARLY
NOV 3 CMC Rohrbacher c
NOV 4 Stutz suborns perjury at
Robin Donlan deposition
DEC 9 Larkins objection
DEC 17 CVESD & STUTZ WANT YET
ANOTHER PROTECTIVE ORDER
| FEB 2004 $$$ ??? Diane Crosier claims that the Stutz invoice is "not available." |
| Letter to CVESD Supt. Lowell Billings |
| DEC 4 01 letter to CVE board DEC 5 letter to Jim Groth |
DEC 02 CVE violated bylaws
| JULY 23 04 Opposition to CTA Motion to Strike August 04 Motion for Reconsideration re CTA fraud |
JAN 04 Malpractice against
Elizabeth Schulman
Elizabeth Schulman
JUN 4 Notice of related case (Schulman)
SEPT 7 04 Opposition to Robin
Donlan motion to compel
Donlan motion to compel
| July 29 03 Stutz incurred costs for pointless filing of opposition to Larkins being allowed to file 6AC |
DEC 9 03 Stutz Demurrer and
Motion to Strike 1 inch thick;
asked for judicial notice of OAH
decision
Motion to Strike 1 inch thick;
asked for judicial notice of OAH
decision
| JAN 23 03 $19,488.82 FEB 20 $7,825.92 MARCH IS MISSING WHY??? APRIL 25 $4,932.10 MAY 23 $5,229.53 JUNE IS MISSING WHY???? JULY 29 $3,447.39 AUGUST 15 $5,298.07 SEPT 18 $2,366.41 OCTOBER IS MISSING WHY???? NOVEMBER IS MISSING WHY??? PERHAPS THE ANSWER IS IN THE DECEMBER BILL, WHICH SHOWS A BALANCE FORWARD OF $2,192.43 WHY DIDN'T SDCOE WANT TO PAY IT? DEC 9 $3,547 (including balance forward) Diane Crosier, executive director of SDCOE-Joint Powers Authority, flagrantly violates the California Public Records Act to cover up wrongdoing. |
| MAR 17 ex parte re discovery abuses |
MARCH 24 04 letter to Deborah Garvin
| FEB 12 2001--LARKINS WAS REMOVED FROM CLASSROOM BY ASST SUPERINTENDENT WERLIN DUE TO ALLEGATIONS THAT SHE WAS GOING TO KILL TWO TEACHERS. MAR 24 2001-LARKINS WAS ASKED TO RETURN TO HER CLASSROOM WITH NO INVESTIGATION. MAR 27 2001-LARKINS WAS TOLD NOT TO RETURN TO DISTRICT PROPERTY. APR 4, 2001--LARKINS WAS ASKED TO RETURN TO HER CLASSROOM WITH NO INVESTIGATION. APR 20 2001-LARKINS WAS TOLD NOT TO RETURN TO DISTRICT PROPERTY. APR 21, 2001-- A POLICE PRESENCE WAS ESTABLISHED AT CASTLE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WHICH CREATED AN IMPRESSION IN THE COMMUNITY THAT LARKINS WAS DANGEROUS. SEPT 2001--LARKINS WAS ORDERED TO RETURN TO WORK WITHOUT ANY INVESTIGATION. SHE FELT SHE WAS NOT SAFE AT WORK AND REFUSED TO RETURN UNTIL THE ALLEGATIONS HAD BEEN RETRACTED. NO INVESTIGATION WAS EVER DONE BY CVESD. INSTEAD, CVESD ALTERERED DOCUMENTS AND SUBORNED PERJURY. |
| JUNE 2001--AT THE REQUEST OF PETITIONER'S ATTORNEY, THE DISTRICT AGREED TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST LARKINS. JULY 2001--THE SUPERINTENDENT REFUSED TO REMOVE MR. WERLIN AS SUPERINTENDENT'S DESIGNEE FOR HANDLING LARKINS' GRIEVANCES; AUG 13, 2001--LARKINS WAS TOLD SHE WOULD BE ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE THE FOLLOWING YEAR. |
| Cheryl Cox, Patrick Judd, Pamela Smith, Bertha Lopez and Larry Cunningham, board members of CVESD, ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE DECISIONS BY CVESD IN THIS CASE. IS THE PROBLEM INCOMPETENCE, CORRUPTION, OR A BIT OF EACH? Clearly, CVESD did not believe the SERIOUS-AS-LIFE-AND-DEATH allegations against Maura Larkins in 2001, or they would not have continually asked her to return to work without an investigation. But the district wanted Larkins to keep silent about problems at Castle Park Elementary. Every time Larkins complained that the clique of teachers who controlled the school was out of control, the district retaliated against her. Yet just three years later, the district admitted by its actions that Larkins was right: the district transferred five teachers out of the school. The school has now had eleven principals in eleven years. The same teachers now control the school from the outside: one of them, Peg Myers, is now president of Chula Vista Educators. Superintendent Lowell Billings would have been smarter to have nipped the problems in the bud back in 2001, when the clique committed crimes against Maura Larkins. |
| Why does SDCOE refuse to produce all the billing records of Daniel Shinoff in the Maura Larkins case? |
| JUNE 4 07 California Supreme Court rejects the efforts of CTA lawyers Beverly Tucker (head counsel) Rosalind D. Wolf and Michael D. Hersh to prevent the dismissal of convicted child molester Albert G. Truitt from his teaching job (!!!) |
Maura Larkins' Opposition to
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz'
Motion for Summary Judgment
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz'
Motion for Summary Judgment
May 27 08 Castle Park Meeting
| Before 2000 |
| January 2000 |
| Problems at Castle Park Elementary: Comer Process and Bilingual Program |
| June 4 08 Rally regarding 11 princiapls in 11 years Lowell Billings makes a typical appearance at Castle Park |
| Stutz law firm issues deposition subpoena to Maura Larkins |
Letter to Ray Artiano re Plan B
February 14, 2005
| January 2009 |