"Finally, Williams asked whether Spooner felt bad about taking Darius’ life.
“Not that bad,” he replied softly."
Wis. man says he killed teen neighbor for ‘justice,’ felt ‘not that
bad’ about slaying
The jury deliberated less than a hour and found John Henry Spooner, 76, guilty of first-
degree intentional homicide for fatally shooting his 13-year-old neighbor, Darius
Simmons on May 12, 2012.
By Associated Press
July 18, 2013

MILWAUKEE — A Milwaukee man who killed his 13-year-old neighbor last year testified
Thursday the shooting was “justice” because he thought the teen had broken into his
home and stolen weapons.

John Henry Spooner, 76, said the suspicion that Darius Simmons stole expensive
shotguns of deep sentimental value left him “very, very angry.” Police searched Darius’
home after the shooting and didn’t find the weapons.

A prosecutor alleged that Spooner traded the boy’s life for guns in a desire for revenge.

“I wouldn’t call it revenge. I would call it justice,” Spooner said defiantly, drawing audible
gasps from the courtroom. Darius’ mother, Patricia Larry, threw up her hands and
muttered, “Oh my god.”

Spooner was testifying against the advice of his lawyer. Defense attorney Franklyn
Gimbel told the judge during morning proceedings that his client had suddenly lost the
mental competence to continue with the trial. The judge halted proceedings for a few
hours until a court-appointed psychiatrist performed a brief examination and
pronounced Spooner competent to continue.

Spooner was convicted Wednesday of first-degree intentional homicide. That verdict
advanced the trial to a second phase to determine whether Spooner was sane at the
time of the May 2012 shooting. The second phase was expected to wrap up Friday with
testimony from a doctor hired by the prosecution. A doctor retained by the defense
testified Wednesday that Spooner had anger issues that caused him to periodically
detach from reality.

If the same jurors who convicted Spooner decide he was competent, he’ll face life in
prison. If they conclude he was mentally ill, he could be committed.

Spooner didn’t testify in the first phase. The judge asked him Thursday if he wanted to
testify in the second phase, and Spooner said he’d prefer to give a 15-minute
statement. When told he could only address the jury in the form of sworn testimony and
cross-examination, he agreed to take the stand.

Spooner mostly spoke in a calm voice but sounded anguished as he recounted how he
confronted Darius and shot him in the chest. He recalled that someone had stolen four
shotguns from his home two days earlier, and he was frustrated by a limited police

Gimbel asked him what caused him to shoot the boy.

“I wanted my guns back,” Spooner replied, squeezing his eyes shut and resting his
head against his fingertips. “I just wanted them back so bad.”

Spooner never denied shooting Darius, and acknowledged wanting to kill the teen’s
older brother as well. Theodore Larry, 18, had rushed into the street to help his
wounded brother.

“If there weren’t other people behind him you would have shot him,” prosecutor Mark
Williams offered.

“I would have shot him,” Spooner replied.

The strongest piece of evidence against Spooner was footage from his own surveillance
cameras, which showed him confronting Darius on the sidewalk and pointing a handgun
at him. The boy backpedaled a few steps with his hands up. Spooner then exchanged
words with Darius’ mother on her porch off screen, and then turned and fired one shot
at Darius’ chest.

The teen fled, and Spooner fired a second shot that missed. He tried to shoot a third
time but the gun jammed.

Darius died a few moments later across the street, in his mother’s arms.

Gimbel conceded from the outset that Spooner killed the boy, but argued during the
first phase that the homicide may have been reckless but not intentional, because
Spooner didn’t mean for the shot to be fatal. The jury deliberated for about an hour
Wednesday before rejecting that argument.

Spooner had entered two pleas to the homicide charge: not guilty and not guilty by
reason of mental disease or defect. That set up the trial to be conducted in two phases:
the first to determine whether he was guilty of the homicide, and if so, a second to
determine whether he was mentally competent at the time.

While Spooner didn’t deny what he did, he had a hard time explaining to the prosecutor
why he did it.

When Williams asked if he took the safety off the gun because he wanted to kill the boy,
Spooner said he didn’t know. Williams asked why Spooner fired a second time and
Spooner again said he didn’t know.

Finally, Williams asked whether Spooner felt bad about taking Darius’ life.

“Not that bad,” he replied softly.
Lying and Truth
Girl culture among teachers
Team dysfunction (SDER II site)
Motivated reasoning
Emotional maturity
Delusions of "normal" people
No good deed goes unpunished
Mental health
Ethics in education
Ethics in law
Cal Western ethics
San Diego Education Report
San Diego
Education Report
San Diego Education Report
San Diego
Education Report
San Diego Education
Report Blog
Why This Website

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation



Castle Park Elem

Law Enforcement



Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
Site Map