San Diego Education Report
SDER
San Diego
Education Report
SDER
SDER
SDER
San Diego Education
Report Blog
SITE MAP
Why This Website

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation

SDCOE

CVESD

Castle Park
Elementary School

Law Enforcement

CTA

CVE

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
HOME
STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF & HOLTZ v. MAURA LARKINS
Case No. 37-2007-00076218-CU-DF-CTL

Exhibits


MOTIONS TO AMEND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OPPOSITION
OR CONDUCT JURY TRIAL/ DISSOLVE OR MODIFY
INJUNCTION
MARCH 2, 2012

Exhibit 1          April 6, 2009 Stipulated Injunction

Exhibit 2                December 11, 2009 Modified Injunction

Exhibit 3                Aug. 5, 2011 Court of Appeal Decision overturning Modified Injunction

Exhibit 4                April 6, 2009 minute order

Exhibit 5                Declarations of Silvia Peters, Robert Larkins and Maura Larkins regarding
February 20, 2009 summary adjudication hearing

Exhibit 6                April 3, 3009 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 7                April 6, 2009 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 8                August 7, 2009 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 8b        March 10, 2010 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 9         October 30, 2009 tentative ruling

Exhibit 10        Feb. 3, 2012 Tentative ruling—Motion to Strike and CMC continued
Exhibit 11         April 25, 2008 court reporter’s transcript of hearing re Motion to Compel
                          Dan Shinoff’s deposition

Exhibit 12        Aug. 7, 2009 tentative ruling (signed)

Exhibit 13            March 10, 2010        minute order re contempt

Exhibit 14         Feb. 20, 2009 tentative ruling granting Summary Adjudication

Pleadings
Exhibit 15                Declaration of Maura Larkins, with photocopy of envelope
                  postmarked Feb. 27, 2009 and Declaration of Richard Romero
                  saying the proposed order was sent on Feb. 25, 2009

Exhibit 16               June 27, 2011 Plaintiff pleading taking second motion to strike off calendar

  

Exhibit 17        Plaintiff’s proposed amended order for SA

Exhibit 18        Defendant’s objections to proposed amended order for Summary
          Adjudication with three exhibits:
  Exhibit 1 pp. 61-63 April 6, 2009 transcript
  Exhibit 2        April 6, 2009 minute order
  Exhibit 3 Feb. 20, 2009 tentative ruling
                  granting Summary Adjudication

Emails and letters

Exhibit 19                Nov. 17, 2011        email to Daniel Shinoff regarding his letter to me which was
Exhibit in his Declaration supporting Summary Adjudication

Exhibit 20                Nov. 29, 2011        letter to Daniel Shinoff with copy of his Jan. 28, 2005 letter
to Maura Larkins and printout of review written by Michelle Shinoff July 29, 2007; also verification
of fax transmission

Exhibit 21          Emails about lengthy, irrelevant pleadings
May 2, 2011        email to Brent Douglas
May 16, 2011        letter to Brent Douglas
Dec. 5, 2011        email to Brent Douglas
                     Dec. 5, 2011        letter to Brent Douglas

Exhibit 22        Emails from Maura Larkins to Richard Romero
  Sept. 24, 2009     re issue #1 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Sept. 24, 2009     re issue #4 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Sept. 29, 2009     re issue #2 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Oct. 1, 2009        re all issues Aug. 20, 2009 letter (all 5 pages)
  Oct. 1, 2009        re Leslie Devaney issue in Aug. 20, 2009 letter

Exhibit 23        Dec. 8, 2011        My email to Richard Romero et al reminding                 summary
Adjudication and his response saying “no         such minute
  order on file” (3 pages)

Exhibit 24        Dec. 8, 2011        4 messages: My email to James Holtz et al re failure
                  to amend Summary Adjudication; includes my scanned April 6,
                  2009 minute order to Richard Romero at 4:41 p.m. And 5
                  messages, including Richard’s thank you. (6 pages total)

Exhibit 25        Dec. 8, 2011        My letter to James Holtz et al re failure to amend
                  Summary Adjudication order.  Includes:
                          April 6, 2009 3 pages transcript
                          April 6, 2009 minute order (2 pages)
                          Sep. 13, 2011 email to Jeffrey Wade, Jr. re failure to amend
                          Dec. 8, 2011 email re failure to amend
                          Fax verification of above

Exhibit 26        Sep. 13, 2011        email to Jeffrey Wade Jr. re summary adjudication

Exhibit 27        Jan. 4, 2012        email to Mr. Romero I have removed many passages
  Jan. 5, 2012        email to Mr. Romero: I fixed FFF page, my health

Exhibit 28        Jan 16-17, 2012   email to Stutz re attempt to meet and confer about Stutz
                  objections about website in Mr. Romero’s declaration;
                  includes contents of phone call

Exhibit 29                Jan. 18, 2012                email from Mr. Romero
                                  “Attached please find a proposed amended order”

Exhibit 30          Jan. 19, 2012        email notifying Stutz of objections to proposed Summary
          Adjudication Order

Exhibit 31           Jan. 19, 2012     6-page Meet and confer regarding statements on my
                  website to which Mr. Romero objected in his Jan. 4, 2012
                  declaration

                  Jan. 24, 2012  email to Richard “Here's what the depublished page looks
                                  like now”

Exhibit 32        Feb. 3, 2012         To James Holtz
                                  Your Reply
                                  I've attached Exhibits A and B
                                  Oops! Here's a much better scanned version of Exhibit B
                                  You don't even know why I was fired, do you?  

Exhibit 33         Feb. 3, 2012        To Stutz group: 5-page email regarding hoax Exhibit B
                                  titled “I was going to file objections and a declaration
                                  regarding your Reply regarding the 3rd Motion to Strike
                                  Answer”; also, second version of the same email with files
                                  of Plainitff’s Exhibits A and B attached

Exhibit 34        Feb. 4, 2012        2-page email to James Holtz regarding inaccurate Exhibit F
Depositions

Exhibit 37         June 16, 2008        deposition of Maura Larkins

Exhibit 38         Nov. 4, 2004        deposition of Sam Gross, representative of Sheriff of Santa
Barbara

Other documents
Exhibit 40        Plaintiff’s Exhibit A for Reply regarding 3rd Strike Motion

Exhibit         41        Plaintiff’s Exhibit B for Reply regarding 3rd Strike Motion

Exhibit         42        Plaintiff’s Exhibit F for Reply regarding 3rd Strike Motion

Google searches

Exhibit 44        My search “Daniel Shinoff” with same results as Stutz Feb. 1, 2012 plus the second
page of Google results
Printouts from website and blogs

Exhibit 45         DEC. 13, 2011        “Daniel Shinoff presentation: ‘Litigation in Schools
                                          Involving Athletics’”

Exhibit  46a         Oct. 11, 2007 “Child Molesters win one” original version Feb. 1, 2012

Exhibit  46b         Oct. 11, 2007 “Child Molesters win one” with first sentence
removed Feb. 1, 2012

Exhibit  46c         Oct. 11, 2007 “Victims of sexual abuse lose one”  Feb. 3, 2012

Exhibit 47        printout of de-published “coverupbyArtianoShinoffHoltz”
                  currently depublished page mauralarkins.com/
                  coverupbyArtianoShinoffHoltz.html (The page will be republished
                  with a different web address)

Exhibit 48           David Alberts page from mauralarkins.com

Exhibit 49        Article from Maura Larkins website about Leslie Devaney

News stories

Exhibit 51        North County Times April 27, 2003 article about Daniel Shinoff

Exhibit 52        The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's Furies By LESLIE
                  DEVANEY, December 12, 2005 Voice of San Diego

Exhibit 53        Sept. 22, 2011        NCT article re Shinoff advising district to hire him
                  to litigate on behalf of teacher who sued a parent for harassment

Exhibit 54         Legality of Tri-City meeting disputed North County Times         
                  Jan. 16, 2009 (re Leslie Devaney)
Exhibit 55        Feb. 1, 2012        “LA school officials chided for molest case silence”
Schools have a policy of concealing events; the public
has a right to discuss this policy





Opposition to 3rd Strike Motion by Stutz

Exhibits 1 through 5 are the same as exhibits 1-5 to Modify or Dissolve Injunction

Exhibit 7                April 6, 2009 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 8                August 7, 2009 court reporter’s transcript

Exhibit 9         October 30, 2009 tentative ruling

Exhibit 10          Emails about lengthy, irrelevant pleadings
                                  May 2, 2011        email to Brent Douglas
                                  May 16, 2011        letter to Brent Douglas
                                  Dec. 5, 2011        email to Brent Douglas
                                  Dec. 5, 2011        letter to Brent Douglas

Exhibit 11         Legality of Tri-City meeting disputed North County Times         
                  Jan. 16, 2009

Exhibit 12        Article from Maura Larkins website about Leslie Devaney

Exhibit 13        The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's Furies By LESLIE
                  DEVANEY, December 12, 2005 Voice of San Diego

Exhibit 14        Sept. 22, 2011        NCT article re Shinoff advising district to hire him
                  to litigate on behalf of teacher who sued a parent for harassment

Exhibit 15        currently depublished page mauralarkins.com/
                  coverupbyArtianoShinoffHoltz.html (The page will be republished
                  with a different web address)

Exhibit 16          Feb. 20, 2009 tentative ruling granting Summary Adjudication

Exhibit 17        Emails from Maura Larkins to Richard Romero
  Sept. 24, 2009     re issue #1 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Sept. 24, 2009     re issue #4 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Sept. 29, 2009     re issue #2 Aug. 20, 2009 letter
  Oct. 1, 2009        re all issues Aug. 20, 2009 letter (all 5 pages)
  Oct. 1, 2009        re Leslie Devaney issue in Aug. 20, 2009 letter


Exhibit 18

Exhibit 19        North County Times April 27, 2003 article about Daniel Shinoff

Exhibit 20               June 27, 2011 Plaintiff taking second motion to strike off calendar

Exhibit 21            March 10, 2010        minute order re contempt

Exhibit 22           David Alberts page
  
Exhibit 23        Aug. 7, 2009 tentative ruling (signed)

Exhibit 24        Plaintiff’s proposed amended order for SA

Exhibit 25        Defendant’s objections to proposed amended order for Summary
          Adjudication with three exhibits:
  Exhibit 1 pp. 61-63 April 6, 2009 transcript
  Exhibit 2        April 6, 2009 minute order
  Exhibit 3 Feb. 20, 2009 tentative ruling
                  granting Summary Adjudication

Exhibit 26        Dec. 8, 2011        My first email to Richard Romero et al reminding                 
summary Adjudication and his response saying “no         such minute
  order on file” (3 pages)

Exhibit 27        Dec. 8, 2011        4 messages: My email to James Holtz et al re failure
                  to amend Summary Adjudication; includes my scanned April 6,
                  2009 minute order to Richard Romero at 4:41 p.m. And 5
                  messages, including Richard’s thank you. (6 pages total)

Exhibit 28        Dec. 8, 2011        My letter to James Holtz et al re failure to amend
                  Summary Adjudication order.  Includes:
                          April 6, 2009 3 pages transcript
                          April 6, 2009 minute order (2 pages)
                          Sep. 13, 2011 email to Jeffrey Wade, Jr. re failure to amend
                          Dec. 8, 2011 email re failure to amend
                          Fax verification of above

Exhibit 29        Sep. 13, 2011        email to Jeffrey Wade Jr. re summary adjudication

Exhibit 30 Jan. 4, 2012        email to Mr. Romero I have removed many passages

Exhibit 31 Jan 16, 2012   email to Stutz re attempt to meet and confer

Exhibit 32 Jan. 18, 2012        email from Mr. Romero
  “Attached please find a proposed amended order”

Exhibit 33  Jan. 19, 2012        email notifying Stutz of my objections to proposed
  Summary Adjudication Order

Exhibit 34   Jan. 19, 2012             Meet and confer regarding statements on my website to which
you objected in your Jan. 4, 2012 declaration


Exhibit         35        Jan. 5, 2012        My email to meet and confer re FFF page and my health

Exhibit 36        Jan. 16, 2012        email from Larkins to Stutz attempting to meet and confer about
Stutz objections about website in Mr. Romero’s declaration and about phone call in which Mr.
Romero hung up on me because he didn’t want me to write down what he said




Motion for Reconsideration of May 30, 2012 rulings


Exhibit 1                Feb 16, 2012 Transcript ex parte hearing to combine motions
Exhibit 2                March 8, 2012 tentative ruling
Exhibit 3                March 9, 2012 hearing transcript
Exhibit 4                Defendant’s notes of oral arguments
Exhibit 5                Proof of Service May 31, 2012 and photocopy of envelope
Exhibit 6                March 12, 2012 Minute order saying I can file response to Reply
Exhibit 7                May 30, 2012 Minute order
Exhibit 8                March 27, 2012 Defendant’s transcript of discussion with clerk Pat Legler
Exhibit 9                Letter from Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Commander Sam Gross


June 21, 2012 ex parte request for Stay
Richard Romero’s letter (Exhibit 3)?

June 27, 2012  Ex parte request for stay and clarification of
injunction
Taken off calendar by judge
no exhibits


July 17, 2012 ex parte request for clarification of injunction--
moved to July 27, 2012 by judge

Exhibit 1                 “The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's Furies” by Leslie
                          Devaney, published by Voice of San Diego on December
                          12, 2005.

Exhibit 2                 documents from the B.J. Freeman case
                         Plaintiff’s Opposition to Demurrer 8 pages
                         Request for Dismissal by Stutz 2 pages
                         Case Management Statement 5 pages




Defendant’s Brief for July 27, 2012 hearing re Motion to Strike

Exhibit 1                 Letter from Daniel Shinoff to Defendant included as Exhibit E from in Mr.  
                Shinoff’s Declaration in Support of Motion for Summary
                Adjudication heard Feb. 20, 2009 by Judge Hayes in the instant case,
                #37-2007-00076218-CU-DF-CTL


Exhibit 2                 Complaint filed by Daniel Shinoff in County of San Francisco on behalf
                        of Christopher Crosier, the son of Mr. Shinoff’s overseer at San Diego
                        County Office of Education, Diane Crosier

Exhibit 3                Defendant’s June 28, 2012 Petition for Writ of Review,
                California Court of Appeal

Exhibit 4                         Vista Unified School District v. B.J. Freeman  
                        Plaintiff’s Opposition to Demurrer, 8 pages
                        Request for Dismissal by Shinoff/Abed, 2 pages
                                Case Management Statement, 5 pages
                        Reply, Motion to strike portions of amended complaint,
                                8 pages; Demurrer

Exhibit 5                         Request for restraining order against Kathleen Elton

Exhibit 6                         Decision in case of Kayla—to show facts of Plaintiff’s court filings

Exhibit 7                        Aug. 22, 2003        Sixth Amended Complaint: Violation of Labor Code
                                        section 432.7 [a criminal statute], etc.
                                        filed by Maura Larkins

Exhibit 8                        Rodger Hartnett declaration regarding San Diego County Office of
                        Education

Exhibit 9                         Judge Judith Hayes’ decision in Digital Cornerston, Inc.
                                                 v. Kevin Carmony

Exhibit 10                         July 17, 2012                
                                 Defendant’s ex parte request in this case asking for
                                clarification of injunction and that court reveal which
                                statements it found to be violations of injunction in its
                                 rulings
                                of Aug. 7, 2009, Oct. 30, 2009, Dec. 11, 2009
        (includes exhibit of “The Collateral Damage of Aguirre's
        Furies” by Leslie Devaney, published by Voice of San Diego on
        December 12, 2005.

Exhibit 11                         Claudia Houston v. Daniel Shinoff, complaint for
                                                 tortious interference


Exhibit 18                        Complete Defendant’s brief for July 27, 2012 hearing re Motion to Strike
                        that Defendant asks the court to file and consider for
                        the July 27, 2012 hearing re Motion to Strike decision        

Newspaper articles
Exhibit 19        “A History of Death Threats, Scandal and Sewage-Tainted Water”
                October 16, 2011, Rob Davis, Voice of San Diego

Exhibit 20a         “Judge's tentative ruling disqualifies MCC attorneys from Hatoff case”
                August 24, 2007 By PHILIP K. IRELAND North County Times

Exhibit 20b               “Teacher's suit vs. MiraCosta awaits ruling”
                 Aug 25, 2007 By Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE

Exhibit 21                   “Judge reverses decision on attorneys in MiraCosta case”
                Sept 6, 2007        By Lola Sherman SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE

Exhibit 22        “Longtime MiraCosta College official placed on leave”         
                August 26, 2006 By: DAVID GARRICK North County Times

“MCC settles with former administrator for $500K”
Dec. 12, 2007 By PHILIP K. IRELAND North County Times

Exhibit 23         “Balboa Park plan to clear cars, parking is approved”
                U-T San Diego, July 9, 2012
                “Letters: Balboa Park  debate continues” U-T San Diego, July 12, 2012
Exhibit 24                     “The Schoolhouse Lawyer Who Helped Hire His Overseer”
                       By EMILY ALPERT March 3, 2009




Defendant’s websites and blogs

Exhibit 25a                “I’m wondering if there’s anything you hold sacred…”
                        page 8 out of 16 of http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.html

Exhibit 25b        page 10 out of 16 http://mauralarkins.com/DanielShinoffDeclaration.html


Exhibit 26         Pages 3 and 4 of the webpage at  http://mauralarkins.com/MiraCostaShinoff.html

Exhibit 27a        Pages 11 and 12 http://www.sandiegoeducationreport.org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
                                        printed out by Defendant before erasing letter
Exhibit 27b         Pages 10- 12 http://www.sandiegoeducationreport.org/stutzartianoshinoff.html
                                printed out after I erased two quotes

Exhibit 29        Page 1 http://sandiegoeducationreport.org/DepoMLpp105-115.html
                                        after I erased (compare to Plaintiff Exhibit G)

Exhibit 30a         printed July 7, 2012  http://learningboosters.blogspot.com/2008/11/guhsd-
attorney-dan-shinoff-admits-to.html (compare to Plaintiff Exhibit H)

Exhibit 30b
printed July 7, 2012  http://learningboosters.blogspot.com/2008/11/guhsd-attorney-dan-shinoff-
admits-to.html

Exhibit 31                 page 1 BJ Freeman page sandiegoeducationreport.net/BJFreeman.html

Emails and letters
Exhibit 32        Jul. 2, 2012 –July 17, 2012        letters and emails to Plaintiff regarding contempt
sanctions