Attorney Paul Carelli, Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
Paul V. Carelli, IV, obtained his undergraduate degree from the
University of Notre Dame in Indiana in 1989, and graduated cum laude from
California Western School of Law in San Diego. While at California Western,
he served as the Associate Notes and Comments Editor for the California
Western Law Review/International Law Journal.
Admitted to the California State Bar in 1997, Mr. Carelli is an active member of
the San Diego County Bar Association, and serves on the Appeals Committee.
He is also an active member of the Southwest Riverside County Bar
Association. His practice focuses on appellate law, civil litigation, and general
counsel, with an emphasis on employment, constitutional, public entity, and
education law.
Besides his trial experience, Mr. Carelli is certified by the Legal Specialization
Board of the California State Bar as a specialist in Appellate Law...
Carter v. Escondido Union High School District (2007) 48 Cal.App.
4th 922, 56 Cal.Rptr.3d 262 [reversing $1.3 million dollar jury verdict, and
holding that whistleblower’s statement to school officials warning that a coach
had recommended a weight-gain supplement to a student does not provide a
legal basis for termination in violation of public policy]
Paul V. Carelli, IV, obtained his undergraduate degree from the
University of Notre Dame in Indiana in 1989, and graduated cum laude from
California Western School of Law in San Diego. While at California Western,
he served as the Associate Notes and Comments Editor for the California
Western Law Review/International Law Journal.
Admitted to the California State Bar in 1997, Mr. Carelli is an active member of
the San Diego County Bar Association, and serves on the Appeals Committee.
He is also an active member of the Southwest Riverside County Bar
Association. His practice focuses on appellate law, civil litigation, and general
counsel, with an emphasis on employment, constitutional, public entity, and
education law.
Besides his trial experience, Mr. Carelli is certified by the Legal Specialization
Board of the California State Bar as a specialist in Appellate Law...
Carter v. Escondido Union High School District (2007) 48 Cal.App.
4th 922, 56 Cal.Rptr.3d 262 [reversing $1.3 million dollar jury verdict, and
holding that whistleblower’s statement to school officials warning that a coach
had recommended a weight-gain supplement to a student does not provide a
legal basis for termination in violation of public policy]
| ''' |
| San Diego Education Report |
| SDER |
San Diego
Education Report
Education Report
| SDER |
| SDER |
| SDER |
| San Diego Education Report |
| SDER |
San Diego
Education Report
Education Report
| SDER |
| SDER |
| SDER |
Deposition of Ray
Artiano by the author
of this website (with
Dan Shinoff acting as
Artiano's counsel)
Artiano by the author
of this website (with
Dan Shinoff acting as
Artiano's counsel)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Mary Chambers vs. Casey
Currigan Register of Actions
(ROA)
Case Number:
37-2011-00096375-CU-PO-NC
Date Filed: 08/16/2011
Case Title: Mary Chambers vs. Casey
Currigan
Case Status: Pending
Case Category: Civil - Unlimited
Location: North County
Case Type: PI/PD/WD - Other
Judicial Officer: Jacqueline M.
Stern
Department: N-27
Representation
Chambers, Colton Plaintiff [by]
DENENBERG, STEVAN L
7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE SUITE 500
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
(619) 497-2552, (619) 497-2662
Self-Represented Chambers, Mary
Guardian Ad Litem
Currigan, Casey Defendant [by] CARELLI
IV, PAUL V
STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF & HOLTZ 2488
Historic Decatur Road 200 San Diego CA
92106 6133
(619) 232-3122
CHAMBERS, COLTON
73
05/09/2013 Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD
generated.
72
05/09/2013 Clerk's Certificate of Service By Mail
(Minutes Only) SD generated.
71
05/09/2013 Minutes finalized for Civil Jury Trial
heard 05/09/2013 09:00:00 AM. Minute Order
70
05/09/2013 Civil Jury Trial
continued pursuant to Court's
motion to 11/08/2013 at 08:30AM
before Judge Jacqueline M. Stern.
67
05/08/2013
Civil Jury Trial scheduled for 05/09/2013 at
09:00:00 AM at North County in N-27
Jacqueline M. Stern.
66
05/08/2013
The Civil Jury Trial was rescheduled to
05/09/2013 at 09:00:00 AM in N-27 before
Jacqueline M. Stern at North County.
65
04/26/2013
Order - Other (Appointment of Official
Reporter Pro Tempore) filed by The Superior
Court of San Diego.
64
04/26/2013
Notice of Hearing SD generated.
63
04/26/2013
Minutes finalized for Civil Jury Trial heard
04/26/2013 08:30:00 AM.
Minute Order
62
04/26/2013
Civil Jury Trial scheduled for 05/13/2013 at
09:00AM before Judge Jacqueline M.
Stern.
60
04/24/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 9) filed by
Currigan, Casey.\nRefers to: Chambers, Colton
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
59
04/24/2013
Declaration - Other (OF NEAL GIBBONS IN
SUPPORT OF PLTFS OPPO IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE) filed by Chambers,
Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
58
04/24/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 14) filed by
Chambers, Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
57
04/19/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 9) filed by
Chambers, Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
56
04/22/2013
Trial Brief (4/26) filed by Chambers,
Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
55
04/19/2013
Motion in Limine (Motions in Limine 1-14) filed
by Currigan, Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
54
04/19/2013
Trial Brief filed by Currigan, Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
53
02/22/2013
Notice - Other (NOTICE OF POSTING JURY
FEES) filed by Chambers, Colton.
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
52
02/06/2013
Notice of Jury Fee Deposit filed by Chambers,
Colton.
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
51
02/15/2013
Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD generated.
Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD
50
02/15/2013
Minutes finalized for Trial Readiness
Conference (Civil) heard 02/15/2013 10:00:00
AM.
Minute Order
49
02/15/2013
Civil Jury Trial continued pursuant to Court's
motion to 04/26/2013 at 08:30AM before
Judge Jacqueline M. Stern.
46
02/08/2013
Minutes finalized for Motion Hearing (Civil)
heard 02/08/2013 01:30:00 PM.
Minute Order
45
02/07/2013
Tentative Ruling for Motion Hearing (Civil)
published.
43
02/05/2013
Minutes finalized for Ex Parte heard
02/05/2013 08:30:00 AM.
Minute Order
42
02/05/2013
Order - Other (Compelling the Production of
All Medical and Billing Records From
PCSD/SASHA Griffin, NP) filed by Currigan,
Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
Currigan Register of Actions
(ROA)
Case Number:
37-2011-00096375-CU-PO-NC
Date Filed: 08/16/2011
Case Title: Mary Chambers vs. Casey
Currigan
Case Status: Pending
Case Category: Civil - Unlimited
Location: North County
Case Type: PI/PD/WD - Other
Judicial Officer: Jacqueline M.
Stern
Department: N-27
Representation
Chambers, Colton Plaintiff [by]
DENENBERG, STEVAN L
7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE SUITE 500
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
(619) 497-2552, (619) 497-2662
Self-Represented Chambers, Mary
Guardian Ad Litem
Currigan, Casey Defendant [by] CARELLI
IV, PAUL V
STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF & HOLTZ 2488
Historic Decatur Road 200 San Diego CA
92106 6133
(619) 232-3122
CHAMBERS, COLTON
73
05/09/2013 Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD
generated.
72
05/09/2013 Clerk's Certificate of Service By Mail
(Minutes Only) SD generated.
71
05/09/2013 Minutes finalized for Civil Jury Trial
heard 05/09/2013 09:00:00 AM. Minute Order
70
05/09/2013 Civil Jury Trial
continued pursuant to Court's
motion to 11/08/2013 at 08:30AM
before Judge Jacqueline M. Stern.
67
05/08/2013
Civil Jury Trial scheduled for 05/09/2013 at
09:00:00 AM at North County in N-27
Jacqueline M. Stern.
66
05/08/2013
The Civil Jury Trial was rescheduled to
05/09/2013 at 09:00:00 AM in N-27 before
Jacqueline M. Stern at North County.
65
04/26/2013
Order - Other (Appointment of Official
Reporter Pro Tempore) filed by The Superior
Court of San Diego.
64
04/26/2013
Notice of Hearing SD generated.
63
04/26/2013
Minutes finalized for Civil Jury Trial heard
04/26/2013 08:30:00 AM.
Minute Order
62
04/26/2013
Civil Jury Trial scheduled for 05/13/2013 at
09:00AM before Judge Jacqueline M.
Stern.
60
04/24/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 9) filed by
Currigan, Casey.\nRefers to: Chambers, Colton
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
59
04/24/2013
Declaration - Other (OF NEAL GIBBONS IN
SUPPORT OF PLTFS OPPO IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE) filed by Chambers,
Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
58
04/24/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 14) filed by
Chambers, Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
57
04/19/2013
Motion in Limine (NO'S 1 THRU 9) filed by
Chambers, Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
56
04/22/2013
Trial Brief (4/26) filed by Chambers,
Colton.\nRefers to: Currigan, Casey
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
55
04/19/2013
Motion in Limine (Motions in Limine 1-14) filed
by Currigan, Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
54
04/19/2013
Trial Brief filed by Currigan, Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
53
02/22/2013
Notice - Other (NOTICE OF POSTING JURY
FEES) filed by Chambers, Colton.
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
52
02/06/2013
Notice of Jury Fee Deposit filed by Chambers,
Colton.
Chambers, Colton (Plaintiff)
51
02/15/2013
Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD generated.
Notice of Rescheduled Hearing SD
50
02/15/2013
Minutes finalized for Trial Readiness
Conference (Civil) heard 02/15/2013 10:00:00
AM.
Minute Order
49
02/15/2013
Civil Jury Trial continued pursuant to Court's
motion to 04/26/2013 at 08:30AM before
Judge Jacqueline M. Stern.
46
02/08/2013
Minutes finalized for Motion Hearing (Civil)
heard 02/08/2013 01:30:00 PM.
Minute Order
45
02/07/2013
Tentative Ruling for Motion Hearing (Civil)
published.
43
02/05/2013
Minutes finalized for Ex Parte heard
02/05/2013 08:30:00 AM.
Minute Order
42
02/05/2013
Order - Other (Compelling the Production of
All Medical and Billing Records From
PCSD/SASHA Griffin, NP) filed by Currigan,
Casey.
Currigan, Casey (Defendant)
Sept. 4, 2012
Appeal by Larkins re Denial of
Motion to Dissolve Injunction
--D062738
Appeal by Larkins re Denial of
Motion to Dissolve Injunction
--D062738
38 exhibits pertaining to the
Motion to Strike have
disappeared!
Motion to Strike have
disappeared!
STUTZ'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
asks Court of Appeal to ignore
Larkins' Opening Brief, and allow
Stutz to ignore it
asks Court of Appeal to ignore
Larkins' Opening Brief, and allow
Stutz to ignore it
Decision: Ct of Appeal denies Stutz motion
but grants a second extension for a total of
76 days extension
but grants a second extension for a total of
76 days extension
Stutz' Motion to Consolidate
searchable pdf
searchable pdf
| Paul Carelli declaration searchable pdf |
Stutz v. Larkins update: I'm
appealing the default Judge
Judith Hayes granted to Stutz
in defamation case
D063801 filed Mar. 28, 2013
The judge refused to allow jury trial
See all posts regarding Stutz v. Larkins
defamation lawsuit.
This defamation case, filed against me by Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz on October 5, 2007, is still
clawing its way through the justice system. Four
years ago San Diego Superior Court Judge Judith
Hayes threw out my opposition and all my
evidence and granted Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz' a win in its defamation case against me...
I repeatedly asked for the jury trial that I am
entitled to regarding damages for defamation. But
Stutz law firm and its supporter Judge Hayes
didn't want me to have the opportunity to explain to
a jury the evidence I have proving the truth of the
statements Stutz has complained about.
The funny thing is that there never was any
finding of fact regarding defamation...
So why wasn't Stutz law firm jumping up and down
for joy? ...
I WAS GIVEN AN EXTENSION BY THE COURT OF
APPEAL; IT'S ALMOST AS LONG AS THE ONE
PAUL CARELLI GOT
The Court of Appeal was kind enough to give me
an extension of time to write my Appellant's
Opening Brief.
Interestingly, the Court gave Stutz an
even longer extension to write a
Response to an earlier appeal
because attorney Paul Carelli
wrote a declaration indicating that
he was taking over the job from Ray
Artiano and Jim Holtz so he needed
more time.
The funny thing was, when the
Response was filed on June 3, 2013,
Paul Carelli's name wasn't on it.
I think this may be what Thomas Spahn
is talking about when he says
"litigators are walking an increasingly
fine ethical line."
See also Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
fails to file response in Court of
Appeal even after 46-day extension.
appealing the default Judge
Judith Hayes granted to Stutz
in defamation case
D063801 filed Mar. 28, 2013
The judge refused to allow jury trial
See all posts regarding Stutz v. Larkins
defamation lawsuit.
This defamation case, filed against me by Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz on October 5, 2007, is still
clawing its way through the justice system. Four
years ago San Diego Superior Court Judge Judith
Hayes threw out my opposition and all my
evidence and granted Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz' a win in its defamation case against me...
I repeatedly asked for the jury trial that I am
entitled to regarding damages for defamation. But
Stutz law firm and its supporter Judge Hayes
didn't want me to have the opportunity to explain to
a jury the evidence I have proving the truth of the
statements Stutz has complained about.
The funny thing is that there never was any
finding of fact regarding defamation...
So why wasn't Stutz law firm jumping up and down
for joy? ...
I WAS GIVEN AN EXTENSION BY THE COURT OF
APPEAL; IT'S ALMOST AS LONG AS THE ONE
PAUL CARELLI GOT
The Court of Appeal was kind enough to give me
an extension of time to write my Appellant's
Opening Brief.
Interestingly, the Court gave Stutz an
even longer extension to write a
Response to an earlier appeal
because attorney Paul Carelli
wrote a declaration indicating that
he was taking over the job from Ray
Artiano and Jim Holtz so he needed
more time.
The funny thing was, when the
Response was filed on June 3, 2013,
Paul Carelli's name wasn't on it.
I think this may be what Thomas Spahn
is talking about when he says
"litigators are walking an increasingly
fine ethical line."
See also Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
fails to file response in Court of
Appeal even after 46-day extension.